The Curtain
Jerker: Removing the Veil
Jimmy
Jacobs says, “When I started in nineteen ninety nine, wrestling was in a huge
boom. It was wildly popular. Fast forward eleven years later, pro wrestling is
the black sheep of the entertainment business” (Jacobs). Jacobs had started his
career during the creation of the rift in professional wrestling. He had seen
the curtain pulled away as not only a fan, but also a budding wrestler. This
boom in popularity in professional wrestling created a need for a new kind of
writer, as professional wrestling had moved its focus from the tens of
thousands of fans in local arenas towards the hundreds of millions of fans
around the world viewing professional wrestling on various mediums during the
dawning of the digital age.
With this
shift in professional wrestling writing the view of wrestling also shifted, as
stated by Jacobs, that no longer was wrestling its own sports genre, but soon
wrestling became known, and judged, as entertainment. This began in “2001 when
World Wrestling Entertainment began putting ads in the trade magazines for
television writers” (Oliver). This was unheard of to publicly admit that
professional wrestling was theater. The largest professional wrestling company
in the history of the business had placed a classified ad for the biggest
secret in professional wrestling. At this moment the traditional role of professional
wrestling booker had changed and been replaced by the more modern, television
friendly, creative writer.
Professional
wrestling had evolved into a new age and the creative process needed to evolve
with it. For the first time the audience was in on the story lines of
wrestling, and the writers needed to create the sense of reality without an
illusion of legitimate sport. While this sounds impossible, Roland Barthes
believes this task was not because he sees that the belief in the reality of
the story isn't what is truly important to the creative process in professional
wrestling. Barthes believes that in professional wrestling “there is no more a
problem of truth than in the theatre. In both, what is expected is the
intelligible representation of moral situations which are usually private”
(Barthes 18). This belief in the purpose of professional wrestling is a
strength for the modern creative process as the currently sought after colleges
educated English majors with backgrounds in creative writing, and television,
possess the exceptional ability and trained skill to create these moral
situations for the modern wrestling fan.
The
advantage of hiring professional writers with degrees in creative writing is
the talents and developed skills they possess over a traditional booker. Due to
professional wrestling protecting the secret of the creative process the
position of booker was usually held by former wrestlers or performers. In being
a former, or even current, performer gave a booker the knowledge of how to
manipulate a crowd to believe what they were seeing was real. Bookers didn't
write story lines like a television script with written interviews and detailed
segment break downs. It would not be farfetched to have the whole show for an
evening written out on the napkin of the restaurant the booker had eaten dinner
at.
When
wrestling became entertainment the ability to acquire highly skilled writing
talent also became available. No longer did companies have to search amongst
the secret circle of wrestling to find the creative minds behind the stories
and characters. World Wrestling Entertainment could find the greatest writing
minds of the twenty first century. With all this great ability and skill
professional writers had a very prominent weakness when compared to a
traditional booker; they had a disconnection with the essence of professional
wrestling.
The Mid Card: The
Booker vs. The Writer
The issue
with the creative process of professional wrestling moving into this new need
for professional writers, instead of traditional bookers, becomes the loss of
the connection to professional wrestling's history. While most of the
professional writers will have their own personal histories with professional
wrestling, the exposure can't compare to the pedigree instilled in a
traditional wrestling booker. This knowledge of wrestling's history also
becomes an important part of knowing the limits of the creative process in
professional wrestling.
Due to
professional wrestling's authentic connection to reality as a fun house mirror
that reflects reality back onto reality; there are certain limitations of
reality that have to be respected in writing a wrestling story line. These
types of limitations on creativity don't apply for other mediums that
professional writers work in. When asked about these limitations, Jimmy Jacobs
says,
“There's nothing really like
wrestling. The range for the suspension of disbelief from the audience is very
small. What I mean by this is that in any given TV show there can be terrorists,
rape, flashbacks, and a number of other scenarios and tools the writers can
use. In wrestling all of that is very limited. So often creative writers in
wrestling come up with an idea that may work on a different stage, but for pro
wrestling, it's either offensive or cheesy” (Jacobs)
In presenting such a wrestling product that relies on a
genuine connection with its audience, this violation of the limitations creates
the rift that is present in the current state of professional wrestling. This
limited window for creativity gives wrestling a sense of reality that can be
used in developing the characters that will be the roles of the wrestlers.
The role of
the wrestler is crucial to the creative process in wrestling. Barthes says
that, “wrestling is an immediate pantomime, infinitely more efficient that the
dramatic pantomime, for the wrestler's gesture needs no anecdote, no décor, in
short no transference in order to appear true” (Barthes 18). Barthes is stating
that for the genuine connection of wrestling to happen between the wrestling
match and the audience, the role of the wrestler must come from the wrestler.
This is something that, as a former performer, a traditional booker has a
better grasp on than a professional writer, who find actors to take on
characters. The characters that wrestlers take on are like the sport of
professional wrestling, exaggerated realities.
Gabe
Sapolsky approaches his creative process the same way when it comes to
developing characters for his writing. Sapolsky believes “in developing a
character out of a person's real life personality. I think if you develop a
character and then force someone to play it you won't quite fit” (Sapolsky).
This has become the pitfall with the current process of professional writers
who have been trained to create characters and find actors after creation to
fill the roles. The roles become hollow and without the spark of reality to
create a connection with the audience. In looking at wrestlers as having the
same skill set as professional actors, creative writers produce roles that
don't transfer the ideas from the story lines to the audience with the same
effect as when those characters are forged from the personalities of the men
and women who will assume those roles. The opposing roles of booker and writer
create a paradox where one side’s weakness is the other side’s strength
resulting in a perpetual struggle between the two styles. The solution to this
struggle is the eventual evolution of the role into a hybrid resembling a yin
yang of writer and booker.
No comments:
Post a Comment